Review 
What were the reviewers
thinking?
Notice how the reviews are often logical complements of each other, and therefore mutually incompatible. Perhaps one criticizes the lack of mathematical detail, then another the profusion of mathematical detail. 
Both reviewers are agreed; my algorithm works in practice, but not in (their) theory. 

Reviewer 1 likes it.
Reviewer 2 knows how to kill a short letter by asking for so much more than can be encapsulated in the format. 

Chronicle of a rejection foretold 